Re: [r16-4474 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "value.. = 0;" 1 on Linux/x86_64
Andre Vehreschild via Gcc-regression <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.regression,gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20251021081507.21928454@vepi2> |
Hi, taking the address of a constant like in &0 is usually a bad idea. Therefore in this location it makes sense to have &value. Please do not modify the testcase, but fix the code generation! Regards, Andre On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:54:15 +0800 Ma Yuao <[email protected]> wrote: > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div > dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Hi,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div > dir="auto">Sorry for the regression. Looks like after the patch, the value > gets folded to zero. Like following:</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div > dir="auto">_gfortran_caf_atomic_define \\(caf_token.., 0, 1, &0, 0B, 1, > 4\\);</div><div><br><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto">If it is intended > behavior, I will update the testcase tonight.</div><div class="gmail_extra" > dir="auto"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra" dir="auto">Yuao</div><div > class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2025年10月21日 > 10:23,"Jiang, Haochen" <[email protected]>写道:<br > type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 > .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">On > Linux/x86_64, <br> > > <br> > 2c1949bf152f8fcadb0ef7a44113c41d18724691 is the first bad commit > <br> > commit 2c1949bf152f8fcadb0ef7a44113c41d18724691 > <br> > Author: Yuao Ma <[email protected]> > <br> > Date: Thu Oct 16 22:32:52 2025 +0800 > <br> > > <br> > fortran: allow character in conditional expression > <br> > > <br> > caused > <br> > > <br> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O > scan-tree-dump-times original "_gfortran_caf_atomic_define > \\(caf_token.., 0, 1, &value.., 0B, 1, 4\\);" 1 <br> FAIL: > gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O > scan-tree-dump-times original "value.. = 0;" 1 <br> > > <br> > with GCC configured with > <br> > > <br> > ../../gcc/configure > --prefix=/export/users3/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r16-4474/usr > --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld > --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl > --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap <br> > > <br> > To reproduce: > <br> > > <br> > $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check > RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 > --target_board='unix{-m32}'" <br> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make > check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 > --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'" <br> $ cd > {build_dir}/gcc && make check > RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 > --target_board='unix{-m64}'" <br> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make > check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 > --target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'" <br> > > <br> > (Please directly reply to this email for question about this report.) > <br> > (If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command > line might save that.) <br> > (However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.) > <br> > </p> > </blockquote></div><br></div></div></div> -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de