Regressions on native/master at commit r16-7459 vs commit r16-7448 on Linux/x86_64
Haochen Jiang via Gcc-regression <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.regression |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Regressions on master at commit r16-7459 vs commit r16-7448 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 0 New passes: