Re: [r17-3570 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-12.c scan-assembler-times (movaps|vmovdqa) 4 on Linux/x86_64
"H.J. Lu via Gcc-regression" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.regression,gmane.comp.gcc.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMe9rOoU3K96vE_W3F9TUk8UGzSqtC=rpFtqUkdw=L1FFXMzOA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 8:05 PM Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 07:58:54PM +0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 7:41 PM Haochen Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Linux/x86_64, > > > > > > b8c1b044a4b2884577d3094513a25abcef1161ee is the first bad commit > > > commit b8c1b044a4b2884577d3094513a25abcef1161ee > > > Author: H.J. Lu <[email protected]> > > > Date: Mon Aug 24 08:08:06 2026 +0800 > > > > > > Scan both movaps and vmovdqa in SSE4.1 STV tests > > > > > > caused > > > > > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-11.c scan-assembler-times (movaps|vmovdqa) 4 > > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-stv-12.c scan-assembler-times (movaps|vmovdqa) 4 > > > > These tests failed before my patch. > > Shouldn't that be > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(?:movaps|vmovdqa)" 4 } } */ > or so? > Without ?: the () is counted too I think. > /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(movaps|vmovdqa)" 4 } } */ works for me with $ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-march=x86-64}' i386.exp=sse4_1-stv-11.c" $ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-march=x86-64-v4}' i386.exp=sse4_1-stv-11.c" while -march=cascadelake generates: foo: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movq %rdi, m0(%rip) movq $0, m0+8(%rip) movq %rdi, m1(%rip) movq $0, m1+8(%rip) movq %rdi, m2(%rip) movq $0, m2+8(%rip) movq %rdi, m3(%rip) movq $0, m3+8(%rip) ret .cfi_endproc -- H.J.