Re: gdb.arch vs. gdb.base gcore test cases
Pedro Alves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/03/2013 03:48 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote: > Pedro Alves <[email protected]> writes: > >> Did you check the original patch submission description in the >> mailing list archives for a possible rationale? > > Here's the associated patch submission: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-04/msg00534.html > > It doesn't seem to contain a rationale for the system-gcore test case. > >> Given that "system" is a predefined register group, I think >> "info reg system" works on all targets, though it might come >> out empty if no register is actually in that group on a given >> target. That seems fine for this test. > > Right, that's what I thought. Then why didn't you say so from the get go? ;-) Thus a patch like this should make > gcore-system.exp obsolete (untested): Okay with a ChangeLog entry, and if it passes testing. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves