Re: Variations on inherit.exp

On 06/05/2013 01:30 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:19:27 +0200, Luis Machado wrote:
>> Should we add one more variation of output to inherit.exp? Should
>> the testcase be less picky about the symbolic information?
>
> It should be easier to just use "set print symbol off".
>
> But it would be nice to investigate while x86* has not found the name.

Hum, that doesn't seem to stop GDB from printing the symbolic 
information for vtable pointers.

Looking at print_address_demangle, it seems GDB will always print 
symbolic information when doing vtable outputs.

Maybe it needs fixing.

Luis