Re: Assuming types for PC

> Architectures are free to deal with the types of their PC's as they
> please. Some keep the standard while others don't. I don't have a
> strong opinion here, but i wouldn't call this a bug immediately.
> 
> >
> >>If PC should not have a fixed type, i think it would be best to remove
> >>this check.
> >
> >Please don't.
> 
> Is there a more elaborate reasoning for not removing this check?

Here is a URL to the original discussion. DanielJ mention that we might
want to loosen up the check, but then added something that confirms
Mark's preference:

http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-01/msg00699.html
| Might want to loosen the expected type; I don't think every platform
| returns a function type for PC.
|
| Then again, might not want to - everyone should do so :-)

So, I'm guessing that without a compelling reason to change it,
it should stay that way...

-- 
Joel