Re: Assuming types for PC

> Right. I did some archaeology and ended up at that commit, aimed at
> testing for an internal error fix rather than the correct type of
> PC.

Ah, ok :).

> I didn't find the reasoning particularly clear. Then again, i'm just
> asking to be sure. :-)

Maybe another way of saying this would be "it should, unless proven
otherwise". In your case, it sounds like you are saying "it might",
or perhaps "some platforms don't", to which Mark is replying "show
me" (backed by the architecture manuals) :-) :-) :-).

-- 
Joel