Re: Variable Length Arrays (VLA) proposal
Chris January <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1372665705.3234.3.camel@gumtree> |
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 18:54 -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Just to add another possibility, we implemented VLA for Fortran by > > wrapping read_var_value and then adding a call to f_fixup_value which > > 'fixed up' the type of the variable (filled in the array bounds, etc.) > > by modifying the original type. (It also auto-dereferences pointers). > > One of the questions that need to be asked is whether it's OK to modify > the type in place like that. For Ada, we create new types with the > bounds fixed-up. I think you might run into problems with cached > values, such as the values accessible from the history (Eg: "print $2"). Do you mean in this scenario (excuse the mixed Fortran / GDB commands)? ALLOCATE(array(10, 10)) (gdb) print array $1 = (...) DEALLOCATE(array) ALLOCATE(array(20,20)) (gdb) print $1 Then no, modifying the original type does not work in that case (it breaks $1 as you say). Chris