RE: DW_AT_count is the same as DW_AT_upper_bound?

Rouslan Korneychuk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:08:44 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> But your sample DWARF is a case of dynamic bounds which are supported only in
> experimental branch(es) so far:
> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/FortranVLA
> particularly the branch jankratochvil/vla of git://sourceware.org/git/archer.git

I see. Then it's a wonder it works as well as it does.

Thanks for the quick reply.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.