Re: remote packet size for memory read

On 07/25/13 01:00, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:25 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 09:44 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
>>
>> I haven't analyzed the issue thoroughly, but it's quite plausible
>> you're right.
> Problem of GDB asking to read packetsize/2 has also be detected  with
> the Valgrind gdbserver, which expects that
>     nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 + 4 <= packetsize
> but GDB only guarantees
>      nr_bytes_requested_in_m_packet*2 <= packetsize
>
>
>> If you don't plan on contributing fixes, could you file (separate) bug
>> reports for these, so they don't get lost?
> Have these been filed ? Not seen ...

Haven't come around to do it yet, sorry.
I also wanted to check with valgrind before....

regards,
chris