Re: FYI, I'm back on the C++ camp now.

Matt Rice <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <CACTLOFpzYMM884NRE1i8Hif-175ChZYp9U7c+2Hsb-63pdNkrA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Pedro Alves <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, that's it.  Yep, I've changed my mind.

Interesting, I should probably chime in here and apologize to Jan,
as there was a previous discussion about doing -Wc++-compat without
moving to c++,

I still haven't mustered up motivations for this... where the main
issue is that of nested structures,
both c, and c++ support nested structures but incompatibly, the c
compatible subset of c++ does not.
this in means de-nesting struct foo {  struct bar { } } like
interfaces, which I would probably advocate skipping and never fully
compiling with -Wc++-compat rather than denesting all of the
structures and putting them back together (in the case of a move to
c++)...

and given the ugliness with denesting all of gdb's structures I
figured someone would object to that anyways were we to stay at
-Wc++-compat as I don't really think it helps the code clarity.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.