Re: File missing from the git: texinfo/texinfo.tex
Fred Cooke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABZhLO_+TpQRBBU44sb8Bzaexk+srPYKE3mX_0iuH8LKRyyiRg@mail.gmail.com> |
Redo it and maybe see if we can fix the discontinuity at the same time? Maybe someone can take a look at the existing repo if you can provide a hash/date/other identifier for the problem area, and find a solution to use? How about applying the texinfo to a temp branch and trying to weed out other issues before going to the hassle, too? Fred. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Tom Tromey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> "Hans-Peter" == Hans-Peter Nilsson <[email protected]> writes: > > Hans-Peter> Just a heads-up. > Hans-Peter> Looks like at least one file didn't make it in the git > Hans-Peter> conversion; worse, one needed by the src-release targets (which > Hans-Peter> is used to build releases and snapshots): texinfo/texinfo.tex. > > Hans-Peter> This will cause problems with people's autotesters and snapshot > Hans-Peter> creation. (Tom Tromey is alerted and on it; the git may have to > Hans-Peter> be re-created or something like that.) > > I had put texinfo into the list of directories to remove before > conversion. This caused the problem. > > I think there are two choices to fix it. > > One, fix my script and redo the conversion. This is easy, though (1) it > takes quite a lot of time, (2) any git commits since the first > conversion will have to be re-applied (there aren't many -- I can handle > it), and (3) any work anybody else has done on a clone of the repository > will have to be redone. > > The argument for this choice is mainly that it is more true to the > history. E.g., with the current git repository you can't faithfully > re-create old releases. > > > Two, pretend the problem away and check in the file now. > > > I don't really have a preference. However it would be good to decide > soon. So, please send email today. > > thanks, > Tom