Re: git is live

On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 18:49 +0200, Fred Cooke wrote:
> That's a real shame. A possible and wasteful (resource wise) solution
> might be to have a second url/repo binutlils-gdb-contrib or whatever.
> If done locally on the same server, it could share hard links and not
> take up much space, but I can see the majority hating this idea, and
> that's fair enough.

Well if there was an official project repo for branches separate
from the development repo, I could use that.  I'm just not free
to use something outside of the project itself.

Peter