Re: git is live
Richard Earnshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/10/13 14:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Peter Bergner <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 01:01 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> The URLs: >>> >>> git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git >>> ssh://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git >> >> Ok, it's probably getting old, but I'll add my thanks >> for switching us over. Now to my question... >> >> >From a policy standpoint, are we going to allow vendor branches >> in the git repo like glibc does? I'm hoping the answer is yes. :) >> We didn't allow it before due to it seems CVS issues, but with git, >> it should now be easy. > > GCC has always allowed vendor branches. I don't see any reason that > binutils/gdb should prohibit them. Obviously all the code has to be > under the GPL or some other explicitly permitted license. I believe the GCC policy is that the code must also be assigned to the FSF, just as it would be for trunk. R.