Re: semantics of dynamic varobj

On 11/23/2013 12:37 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I no longer have the full context, but these varobjs are also
> only enabled when the client requests them (a new option
> to -var-create, IIRC).  That is, a regular varobj will include both
> unavailable and available fields, with unavailable fields listed as
> "value=<unavailable>".  For those, which fields are listed
> can be determined "statically", as usual, from the debug info.  While
> this new varobj lists only the available fields, skipping the
> unavailable ones.

The option is "--available-children-only".  I'll post the patches soon.

>
> (*) - Yao, as usual, the whole rationale for that should be
> in CS's internal archives.

Yes, I've got the mail in the archives.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)