Re: Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo

Doug Evans <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <CADPb22SRGp2NSKGim6nwsLw+CJwZ6xJNPTNfJM+smfJ1PE577g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Stan Shebs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 4/5/14 1:12 PM, Edjunior Barbosa Machado wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> at the time when binutils/gdb was moving to git, there has been some
>> discussion in the mailing list [1] about the possibility of hosting
>> vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb git repository but, as
>> far as I understood, there has been no agreement about this policy.
>
> One small point in favor of vendor branches is that it ensures we
> have the code already in hand - if a project goes on the back burner,
> or changes ownership, or an admin leaves, the vendor repo can disappear
> overnight.
>
> On the question of space and activity, are there vendor branches that
> are really so much more active than our trunk?  I would expect them
> be to relatively quiet most of the time, vendor branches typically
> having fewer people doing work on them.

fwiw,
I really like irker's reports on #gdb for the trunk.
OTOH, the S/N ratio on #gdb will monotonically drop over time as use
of vendor branches on binutils-gdb scales up.  There are days when the
S/N ratio on #gdb would drop to barely useful with the branches that
are there now.  If it is really hard to *only* show trunk commits on
#gdb, that is, IMO, a strong argument in favor of putting vendor
branches in a different repo.
*If* one really wanted irker even with it having to report commits in
all branches then one *could* have a separate channel, but it's not my
first choice (or possibly second choice even).
OTOH, #gdb has been relatively quiet for vendor-branch commits
recently, maybe this has already been fixed?

I'm ok with a binutils-gdb-vendor repo or some such.  Seems like it
should be trivial for overseers to set up (I'm assuming people won't
want a copy of trunk in this repo with a cron job, or some such, to
keep it up to date, or any other such time commitment from overseers).
 Whether a separate vendor repo uses materially more resources, I
don't know.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.