Re: Patchwork patch tracking system

> FWIW we (some of the google folk) looked at geritt for LLVM and
> discarded in favor of phabricator. It seemed to solve a lot of the
> problems that we had and allowed communication to and from the mailing
> lists for patches which was key for us as we have a similar review
> style to gcc/gdb/binutils. We didn't want to remove the ability for
> people to send patches to the mailing lists, but yet get a better
> review mechanism for large patches/queuing/etc.

Thanks for the suggestion! I have to say, from the outside,
phabricator looks like a pretty interesting option.

-- 
Joel