Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live!
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! On Sat, 24 May 2014 02:43:38 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]> wrote: > patchwork.sourceware.org > close patches you know you have already pushed into master. Does that mean changing the state to »Accepted« (or »Committed«, once that has been added), or ticking the »Archived« box, or both? What's the meaning of the »Archived« box? > Please also take time to review the workflow for patch reviews: > > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow So, does patchwork's »Delegate to« Patch Property equal Bugzilla's »Assigned To« field? And, it is not totally clear to my why the Patch Review Workflow suggests to »not change the status of the patch« if »changing the Delegate to value to their patchwork username«? "In a perfect world", after a patch review, during which »Delegate to« has been set to the reviewer(s), should it then be changed to the person who is responsible for committing the patch (which may be the submitter, or the reviewer, or someone else), together with changing the state to »Accepted«? Grüße, Thomas
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 472 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJThC8zAAoJEK3/DN1sMFFtj5kIALcswHmUStUxbCNodLVl/OTK GH1bWJqq+QtTPX8Q0W6qfh7HvqeBwt/Tl82JGwdMrliVxPnBiq9fvR4RIklbXdlF ub3NhYWtS/BEVj+mOSF7T7PLZaReUAj0hsDclTXe/QPKfGO5/lqJY+Lddxm07FGI t0kFEk3kTWLUJCP5x8us35tGBFlPr29sZe1BALmH25DLSQA02VABvFswIMJBglUR n3kCDswokJa0nPEGWuuZt8+IYLicJVGzn6UpK9vPlQgvSJGHBh0kpqBMMJ5d7fB8 pD6pYrPKtTwmSDxZF+XHLDtLV+zLzfE++EMCQPR56xKGb4vR3CuQ071MAelGByk= =tz2Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----