Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live!

Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!

On Sat, 24 May 2014 02:43:38 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]> wrote:
> patchwork.sourceware.org

> close patches you know you have already pushed into master.

Does that mean changing the state to »Accepted« (or »Committed«, once
that has been added), or ticking the »Archived« box, or both?  What's the
meaning of the »Archived« box?

> Please also take time to review the workflow for patch reviews:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow

So, does patchwork's »Delegate to« Patch Property equal Bugzilla's
»Assigned To« field?  And, it is not totally clear to my why the Patch
Review Workflow suggests to »not change the status of the patch« if
»changing the Delegate to value to their patchwork username«?

"In a perfect world", after a patch review, during which »Delegate to«
has been set to the reviewer(s), should it then be changed to the person
who is responsible for committing the patch (which may be the submitter,
or the reviewer, or someone else), together with changing the state to
»Accepted«?


Grüße,
 Thomas
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 472 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJThC8zAAoJEK3/DN1sMFFtj5kIALcswHmUStUxbCNodLVl/OTK
GH1bWJqq+QtTPX8Q0W6qfh7HvqeBwt/Tl82JGwdMrliVxPnBiq9fvR4RIklbXdlF
ub3NhYWtS/BEVj+mOSF7T7PLZaReUAj0hsDclTXe/QPKfGO5/lqJY+Lddxm07FGI
t0kFEk3kTWLUJCP5x8us35tGBFlPr29sZe1BALmH25DLSQA02VABvFswIMJBglUR
n3kCDswokJa0nPEGWuuZt8+IYLicJVGzn6UpK9vPlQgvSJGHBh0kpqBMMJ5d7fB8
pD6pYrPKtTwmSDxZF+XHLDtLV+zLzfE++EMCQPR56xKGb4vR3CuQ071MAelGByk=
=tz2Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.