Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live!
Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > Are there any objections to the new state? None so far. I have added it to patchwork now. I have not yet made 'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers. > > That should be set automatically. I use a following script to detect > > commited patches. > > If there are no objections, I guess the script will need to be changed > to put patches in the "Committed" state instead of the "Accepted" state? > > However, really I'd prefer if it could give some indication as to > *which* commit(s) the patch was committed as, and it doesn't look like > this is viable with the current approach, since you seem to just test if > each patch can be applied backwards to HEAD. > > Oh, but now I notice that that *particular* script is glibc-only anyway, > so maybe I don't really care that much ... That particular script was just an example, so ideas for automating this are still welcome. Siddhesh
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTh/RNAAoJEHnEPfvxzyGHnAsH/iRuA3BRD30rEj0AyKE6tD7V sGQMizFiF/5fc9SzX1i2z/n9sNhQX+p5jJV7lKqSJzaOdtrRVHdCIRBHe7iybGVo 6SfVOcxNY05Sm66H3BQDPJPqi1lc89gTDxqumvPCVHPTypYpqOG/767IpAxoy6gR jJIFq9M9ZJRkQaLzkGpBnc79gZoAJHc2GZgcc1LdOpEndjSOy6eehqXJX2gFL5jt 4ltE6+VyOlthFao270QdZNRAI4vsvop013eLbdGt/r5WvFZKo+60dm0g6iJiU4Tb DiHzp096Xkz+F9hyCuHEeBljHsbZ/Ytg/QSR3PkRW906NZwrrGJPbgg/rLuJFTs= =eiXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----