Re: patchwork.sourceware.org is live!

Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Are there any objections to the new state?

None so far.  I have added it to patchwork now.  I have not yet made
'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the
view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers.

> > That should be set automatically. I use a following script to detect
> > commited patches.
> 
> If there are no objections, I guess the script will need to be changed
> to put patches in the "Committed" state instead of the "Accepted" state?
> 
> However, really I'd prefer if it could give some indication as to
> *which* commit(s) the patch was committed as, and it doesn't look like
> this is viable with the current approach, since you seem to just test if
> each patch can be applied backwards to HEAD.
> 
> Oh, but now I notice that that *particular* script is glibc-only anyway,
> so maybe I don't really care that much ...

That particular script was just an example, so ideas for automating
this are still welcome.

Siddhesh
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTh/RNAAoJEHnEPfvxzyGHnAsH/iRuA3BRD30rEj0AyKE6tD7V
sGQMizFiF/5fc9SzX1i2z/n9sNhQX+p5jJV7lKqSJzaOdtrRVHdCIRBHe7iybGVo
6SfVOcxNY05Sm66H3BQDPJPqi1lc89gTDxqumvPCVHPTypYpqOG/767IpAxoy6gR
jJIFq9M9ZJRkQaLzkGpBnc79gZoAJHc2GZgcc1LdOpEndjSOy6eehqXJX2gFL5jt
4ltE6+VyOlthFao270QdZNRAI4vsvop013eLbdGt/r5WvFZKo+60dm0g6iJiU4Tb
DiHzp096Xkz+F9hyCuHEeBljHsbZ/Ytg/QSR3PkRW906NZwrrGJPbgg/rLuJFTs=
=eiXP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.