Re: Is it possible to statically link python into gdb?
Joel Brobecker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I admit that I have to make a compromise here. I am delivering gdb to > my customer and my expectation is that they can use my gdb with python > support no matter there is python in their system and no matter the > version of their installed python. After a lot of attempts, I think I > can't reach my expectation. I guess I have to live with my above > workaround. What we do is statically link Python into GDB, and then distribute both GDB + Python. As long as the path to Python is inside the configured prefix, the path to the Python libraries should be "relocatable", allowing users to install the binary package anywhere and GDB will always find them. One thing we also do that's not done in the FSF version of GDB is the following: @@ -1680,6 +1680,10 @@ message == an error message without a stack will be printed."), #else Py_SetProgramName (progname); #endif + + /* We override any value that the PYTHONHOME might have, as we want + to make sure that we use the Python library that comes with GDB. */ + Py_SetPythonHome (ldirname (python_libdir)); #endif Py_Initialize (); Some users have had their own version of Python which may be incompatible with the version we ship in GDB, so we make sure that within GDB, we use the Python that we built with. -- Joel