Re: trace state variables -- remote protocol

Samuel Bronson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
David Taylor <[email protected]> writes:

> A minor documentation nit --
>
> I am looking into implementing trace state variables for our new GDB
> stub and noticed a discrepancy between the documentation and the code.
>
> In the documentation the QTDV message is described as having two fields
>
>     QTDV:n:value
>
> where 'n' is the trace state variable number and 'value' is its value.
>
> Looking at the code in GDB, it should be:
>
>     QTDV:n:value:builtin:name
>
> where
>
>     n is the trace state variable number
>     value is its value
>     builtin is a boolean -- is it builtin to the stub or not
>     name is a string

Maybe try writing a patch, submitting a bug report, or CCing Eli?
Otherwise, I'd worry that your suggestion might fall through the cracks.
(I've taken the liberty of CCing Eli.)

I would suggest CCing an area maintainer as well, but I'm not sure if
Daniel Jacobowitz is really still active.

(Note that it's not worth writing a patch yourself if you can't/don't
want to complete the annoying copyright assignment paperwork.)

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.