Re: ChangeLogs in commit messages
James Hogan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/09/14 14:24, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> IMHO this is a really bad idea. > > I wouldn't say "a really bad", but I tend to agree with the reasoning. > It's a bit unnatural to me that git would chose to show the author > date by default over the commit date From the patch author point of view, cleaning up a patchset by interactive rebasing, or rebasing to keep their branch up to date, I think the author date probably is more natural, and in less linear histories (look at Linux repo for example) I suspect the commit date wouldn't be as meaningful. FWIW though you can put: [format] pretty=fuller in your ~/.gitconfig to default to the fuller format for git-show and git-log, which shows the committer and commit date. It'd be nice if something similar was possible with git-blame. You can add new pretty formats too, e.g. [pretty] fullcommit = "commit %H\nAuthor: %an <%ae>\nCommitDate: %cd\n\n%B" [format] pretty=fullcommit This shows author name, but commit date, but I didn't figure out how to indent the body like pretty=fuller does. Cheers James