Re: gdbserver stdout/stderr redirection (or tty)
Doug Evans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADPb22Q-gBKT3hYKcTi1fCAMHxKoWEti9zcYJtAJzL7KzgXVVg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Cleber Rosa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Short story: > > While I'm aware that gdbserver is not inteded to be a "daemonized" version > of gdb itself, I wonder if the absence of input/output redirection[1] in > gdbserver can be considered a limitation/bug and what is the interest level > in having that limitation/bug addressed. > > Long story: > > We're working on a test framework that already provides some initial > integration with GDB[2]. > > The architecture used is based on gdbserver+gdb (speaking MI). It starts a > gdbserver per debugged process, and a gdb process to interact with it using > MI. If an a noteworthy event occurs, it disconnects gdb from the gdbserver, > and allows the use to connect to the gdbserver. > > This architecture was chosen because a very important requirement is > allowing users to use *regular*, *unmodified* gdb binaries for this > interaction. > > While this architecture works OK, it does not provide one fundamental > feature: getting the output (and less importantly for now, input) right. > > References: > > 1 - > https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Input_002fOutput.html#Input_002fOutput > 2 - http://avocado-framework.readthedocs.org/en/latest/DebuggingWithGDB.html Hi. I think there is interest in making this work better, but it would be good to get more details on the capabilities you need.