Re: FYI: GCC dropped score support
Pedro Alves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/07/2014 01:18 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> It seems pretty dead, the company's pages are 404, and the only >> product I can find that used it was the Mattel HyperScan, introduced in >> 2006 and discontinued in 2008 - apparently it made PC World's "10 Worst >> Videogames of All Time" list. Eh. :-) >> Even if the code isn't being used, I think it still costs us, in the >> sense that we have to think about whether it needs changing, it has >> to be patchedwhen there are global changes, and so forth. So I >> think we should whack it soon as decently possible. (Of course, the >> code will actually live on forever, in old releases and repos. :-) ) > > Seen under this light, it does make sense! Agreed, that's my thinking too. For still-fresh examples, the software single-step rework work had me stop, think and actually write patches for IRIX (deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint). And then just last week I failed to notice some code was for Tru64 and wasted time writing this patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-10/msg00035.html Thanks, Pedro Alves