Re: dwarf2_physname() question
Yao Qi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Gontarek <[email protected]> writes: > My question is why is dwarf2_physname() ignoring the DW_AT_name if it is > present? The DW_AT_name is supposed to represent the identifier name as it > appears in the source. Shouldn't that take priority when gdb creates the > symbol? DW_AT_name is there but may be broken, GDB has to rely on DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name. I am not very sure on this, so people who are more familiar on dwarf can give comments on top of mine. I find some discussions on this thread, and it may help [RFA] dwarf2_physname FINAL https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00220.html -- Yao (齐尧)