Re: [help] Issues with 'g' packet and MIPS - gdb interprets the packet reply wrong

Christopher Bainbridge <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Many thanks!

It turns out that I mistook the M14000 to be the same as the M14k... 
which, annoyingly, they aren't.

So doing:

     set architecture mips:isa32r2

has solved my problem.

Thanks a lot!
Chris

On 21/10/14 21:34, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
>> I am trying to implement a remote stub for a MIPS cpu (using GDB version 7.8).
>> When GDB asks for the general registers using  the 'g' packet, I reply with:
>>
>> 00000000000000000d01000000000000fffdffff00000000000000000080c0bf30000000f0fec0bf000000002e0000000000000000000000000000008080808000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001800000000000000000e8fec0bf00000000702ec0bf0000000000000000000000000000000000000000702ec0bf
>>
>> As each register is 32 bits (represented by 8 hex characters), this should be
>> all the registers up to and including the PC.
>   What makes you assume the registers are 32 bits each?
>
>> However, GDB prints this out:
>>
>> info reg
>>            zero       at       v0       v1       a0       a1 a2       a3
>>   R0   00000000 0000010d fffffdff 00000000 00000030 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>              t0       t1       t2       t3       t4       t5 t6       t7
>>   R8   00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 80010000 00000000 00000000
>>              s0       s1       s2       s3       s4       s5 s6       s7
>> Sending packet: $p13#d4...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p14#d5...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p15#d6...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p16#d7...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p17#d8...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>>   R16  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>              t8       t9       k0       k1       gp       sp s8       ra
>> Sending packet: $p18#d9...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p19#da...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000000
>> Sending packet: $p1a#02...Ack
>> Packet received: 00000180
>> Sending packet: $p1b#03...Ack
>>
>> etc
>>
>> This looks to be that it is determining the size of each register incorrectly,
>> and is thus asking for more registers using the 'p' packet.
>>
>> Is this a bug on my end or in GDB?
>> I use the command
>>
>> set processor mips:14000
>>
>> beforehand, as this is the processor we're using.
>   You mean:
>
> (gdb) set architecture mips:14000
>
> I presume, right?
>
>   The R14000 is a 64-bit processor so its registers are 64-bit and will be
> treated as such by default by GDB.  You may be able to limit the width of
> registers expected by selecting a 32-bit processor instead or by selecting
> a 32-bit ABI such as `o32'.  The latter can be done with:
>
> (gdb) set mips abi o32
>
> or by selecting a file to debug that has been built for that ABI.
>
>   Please note that this is a grey area though, with a bare-metal stub you
> should be really exchanging registers with GDB in their native sizes and
> letting GDB truncate and extend them as required depending on the ABI used
> by the program being debugged.  GDB is already capable of doing that,
> however in order to make use of that capability both the stub and GDB
> would have to support XML register descriptions which is something that
> owing to the vast number of CP0 register set variants in the MIPS
> architecture has never been implemented.  So in fact you may be hitting
> problems regardless of the ABI selection noted above.
>
>   You can always determine the widths of registers GDB expects with the:
>
> (gdb) maintenance print registers
>
> command -- see the `Type' column on the right for the internal type used
> and note that the registers exchanged with a remote stub are those in the
> low half of indices (`Nr' == `Rel'), the so called "raw registers".
>
>   HTH,
>
>    Maciej
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.