Re: many unused function warnings in gdb 7.9 on darwin
Jack Howarth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADtEn-1SF9Q_XE+wTwjpB-Zny4UEU5kCiPcXnUjf-8X4hmfd+A@mail.gmail.com> |
The clang developers have comments on this issue in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22712#c1. They ask (as I did originally) why we aren't wrapping these functions to keep them from being declared on darwin if they aren't used. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote: > Filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22712 on this issue. > Jack > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Pedro Alves <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 02/24/2015 04:33 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Building the gdb 7.9 release on x86_64-apple-darwin14 produces many >>> warnings of the form... >>> >>> remote.c:2567:1: warning: unused function >>> 'VEC_thread_item_t_embedded_size' [-Wunused-function] >>> DEF_VEC_O(thread_item_t); >>> ^ >>> ./common/vec.h:435:20: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_VEC_O' >>> VEC_T(T); \ >>> ^ >>> ./common/vec.h:863:22: note: expanded from macro '\ >>> DEF_VEC_FUNC_O' >>> static inline size_t VEC_OP (T,embedded_size) \ >>> ^ >>> ./common/vec.h:399:22: note: expanded from macro 'VEC_OP' >>> #define VEC_OP(T,OP) VEC_##T##_##OP >>> ^ >>> <scratch space>:55:1: note: expanded from here >>> VEC_thread_item_t_embedded_size >>> ^ >>> >>> Shouldn't those VEC declarations use a wrapper to avoid them on >>> targets not supporting that code? >> >> AFAIK, -Wunused-function is supposed to be suppressed for >> "static inline" functions: >> >> -Wunused-function >> Warn whenever a static function is declared but not defined >> or a non-inline static function is unused. This warning is >> enabled by -Wall. >> >> Looks like a clang bug here? >> >> (I suspect marking the function with attribute used would >> work around this.) >> >> Thanks, >> Pedro Alves >>