Re: x86_64-elf gdb
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2015-03-30 15:59:49 -0500, Joel Sherrill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/30/2015 3:54 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it. Is that > > > enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition? > > That seems odd to me. What would be the advantage of pushing that > > patch if it's a configuration that you can't test? > > At the moment, x86_64-elf doesn't even build for binutils-gdb. It > fails due to a missing gdb configuration. > > And if binutils-gdb doesn't complete successfully, that means gcc > can't be built for this target. > > Jan.. do you build binutils-gdb and gcc for this target? I didn't build it until a minute ago, just x86_64-linux was on the list. It's added now, so let's wait for the first build to take place and see how well that works. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Alles sollte so einfach wie möglich gemacht sein. the second : Aber nicht einfacher. (Einstein)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlUaCmgACgkQHb1edYOZ4bv32ACePlccEhx0c+gW/Z6DfvSJTfQQ 8CwAnjJaeYaWFb51/EQ4/FysfDqTNMM9 =oDMp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----