Re: x86_64-elf gdb
Joel Sherrill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/30/2015 9:46 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 15:59:49 -0500, Joel Sherrill <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 3/30/2015 3:54 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>>> It built for me. But I don't have any way to test it. Is that >>>> enough to submit a patch for the elf stanza addition? >>> That seems odd to me. What would be the advantage of pushing that >>> patch if it's a configuration that you can't test? >> At the moment, x86_64-elf doesn't even build for binutils-gdb. It >> fails due to a missing gdb configuration. >> >> And if binutils-gdb doesn't complete successfully, that means gcc >> can't be built for this target. >> >> Jan.. do you build binutils-gdb and gcc for this target? > I didn't build it until a minute ago, just x86_64-linux was on the > list. It's added now, so let's wait for the first build to take place > and see how well that works. This is the patch I posted before I dragged you into this. It includes both -elf and -rtems targets. If you use this, just drop the -rtems target. I was just experimenting and realized the -elf target didn't build. With this, it built. $ git diff gdb diff --git a/gdb/configure.tgt b/gdb/configure.tgt index 8feda7c..bd03600 100644 --- a/gdb/configure.tgt +++ b/gdb/configure.tgt @@ -664,6 +664,9 @@ x86_64-*-freebsd* | x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu) i387-tdep.o i386bsd-tdep.o i386fbsd-tdep.o \ bsd-uthread.o fbsd-tdep.o solib-svr4.o" ;; +x86_64-*-elf* | x86_64-*-rtems*) + gdb_target_obs="amd64-tdep.o i386-tdep.o i387-tdep.o i386bsd-tdep.o" + ;; x86_64-*-mingw* | x86_64-*-cygwin*) # Target: MingW/amd64 gdb_target_obs="amd64-tdep.o amd64-windows-tdep.o \ > MfG, JBG > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development [email protected] On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985