Isn't it OK to drop 'set write'?
Jan Kratochvil <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, GDB 'set write on' currently does not work, it has regressed in 7.9: "set write on" or "--write" corrupt the binary file https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18168 due to a485e98ea0cbb61ea9da1e7858da545e0bcf1a46 is the first bad commit Author: Alan Modra <[email protected]> Move ELF section headers to end of object file $ echo 'int foo=10;int main(){}'|gcc -g -x c - $ cp -p a.out a.out-orig $ gdb -q -ex 'set trace-commands on' -ex 'set write on' -ex 'file a.out' -ex 'set foo=20' -ex q +set write on +file a.out Reading symbols from a.out...done. +set foo=20 +q Segmentation fault $ cmp a.out a.out-orig && echo unchanged unchanged It is already unsupported for: writing into executable files is not supported for target: sysroots I cannot much imagine when it is useful. For updates of too big binaries there is gold incremental linking. Personally I have also never considered it safe enough to use it myself, hexedit is there if one needs to create a weird testfile. Either there is some use case for that and so the fix should be 7.10 blocker. Or the feature is no longer useful and it could be dropped which would significantly simplify me a build-id patchset being prepared. Jan