Re: problem with new vforkdone stop reply in 7.10

On 09/15/2015 04:46 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of this.  I don't think you are missing
> anything.  I think I just over-simplified the VFORK_DONE packet
> starting in my first implementation.  The changes make sense to
> me.  It seems like you have this covered, but let me know if I
> can help at all.

Writing tests would be a tremendous help.

> Absolutely, that should be report_exec_events.  I missed making that
> change from a previous version of the patchset that didn't use the
> report_xxx_events variables.

Alright, I'll split in two, and push then in.  Testing showed no
regressions.

> I've started looking at adding some tests to plug some of the gaps in
> fork/exec event testing.  Currently I'm looking at a test that kills the
> fork parent while stopped at a fork catchpoint.  It seems like I should
> add non-stop cases to foll-fork.exp and foll-vfork.exp as well.  And
> maybe the case where there are multiple vforks in progress at the same
> time, if I can come up with something that is reliable.

That would be much appreciated!

Thanks,
Pedro Alves