Re: Question about SSH protocol for developper access

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On Oct 28, 2015, at 6:43 AM, Pierre Muller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>   I am not sure this is the correct mailing list for this question,
> but I was wondering if it would not be better to allow now also SSH version
> 2 keys
> for remote write access to Gnu repositories.
> 
>   The reason for me to ask is simply that protocol 1 is now disabled by
> default on Cygwin installation.
> This means that ssh-agent, which I normally use to avoid having to type my
> password
> each time I access git repository for instance, does not work for my
> SSH-version 1 key anymore.
> 
>   I suppose that this has to do with the fact that version 1 is less
> "secure" than version 2.
> what are the reasons why GNU still insists on only using version 1 keys?

I don't believe that it does.  I have an SSH 2 key registered with the GNU servers, not a V1 key.  Maybe all you need to do is submit your SSH V2 key.

A related question is whether the GNU servers should disable SSH V1 across the board.  It seems like a good idea to do so.

	paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.