Re: Always run GDB command post-hook after pre-hook has been run
Stephen Cross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.patches,gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+gYvwfEjruJeyMWmyUFmKNH=FwwgPJeDfrf1FNtYJ+wWhkvAg@mail.gmail.com> |
I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to look at this patch? (I've also CC'ed the gdb list since I'm looking for input on the approach.) Thanks, Stephen On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Cross <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > We've observed that a command post-hook isn't run if an exception is > thrown (inside GDB) when running the command. Here's a trace of this: > > (gdb) define hook-print >>echo hook-print\n >>end > (gdb) define hookpost-print >>echo hookpost-print\n >>end > (gdb) print test > hook-print > No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command. > (gdb) print "test" > hook-print > $1 = "test" > hookpost-print > > This issue can be fixed by adding a cleanup action for the post-hook > call via the patch below. With this change we get the following trace: > > (gdb) define hook-print >>echo hook-print\n >>end > (gdb) define hookpost-print >>echo hookpost-print\n >>end > (gdb) print test > hook-print > hookpost-print > No symbol table is loaded. Use the "file" command. > (gdb) print "test" > hook-print > $1 = "test" > hookpost-print > > As you can see the post-hook is now always being called, even if the > command fails. > > diff --git a/gdb/top.c b/gdb/top.c > index d1e2271..43b3b7f 100644 > --- a/gdb/top.c > +++ b/gdb/top.c > @@ -388,13 +388,19 @@ maybe_wait_sync_command_done (int was_sync) > wait_sync_command_done (); > } > > +static void > +call_post_hook_cleanup(void* p) > +{ > + execute_cmd_post_hook (p); > +} > + > /* Execute the line P as a command, in the current user context. > Pass FROM_TTY as second argument to the defining function. */ > > void > execute_command (char *p, int from_tty) > { > - struct cleanup *cleanup_if_error, *cleanup; > + struct cleanup *cleanup_if_error, *cleanup, *cmd_cleanup; > struct cmd_list_element *c; > char *line; > > @@ -456,6 +462,7 @@ execute_command (char *p, int from_tty) > > /* If this command has been pre-hooked, run the hook first. */ > execute_cmd_pre_hook (c); > + cmd_cleanup = make_cleanup (call_post_hook_cleanup, c); > > if (c->deprecated_warn_user) > deprecated_cmd_warning (line); > @@ -477,7 +484,7 @@ execute_command (char *p, int from_tty) > maybe_wait_sync_command_done (was_sync); > > /* If this command has been post-hooked, run the hook last. */ > - execute_cmd_post_hook (c); > + do_cleanups (cmd_cleanup); > > } > > I've run the test suite before and after this change and I can't see > any relevant failures. Presumably the patch will also need to include > a test, but I'm hoping to just get comments on the implementation > change first. > > Thanks, > Stephen > > -- > Stephen Cross > > Software Engineer at Undo Software -- Stephen Cross Software Engineer at Undo Software