Re: C++ conversion status update
Pedro Alves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/14/2015 02:40 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves <[email protected]> writes: > We need a wiki page to track these hosts on which we enabled C++ build. > Like this gcc wiki page, https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppBuildStatus or we > can track them in existing https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/cxx-conversion > wiki page. Ok. > >> The plan I propose next is to default to building in C++ mode on hosts >> that are known to build cleanly in C++ mode. Or rather, change the default >> to be C++ mode, _except_ for hosts/ports that haven't been converted >> yet. > > I prefer the latter. > >> Then, as ports get converted, one by one they'll be removed from >> the "can't do C++ yet" list. That gives us a defined stopping point -- when >> the list becomes empty, and after a reasonable period, we can decide to remove >> support for building in C mode and start making use of C++ features. > > That sounds good to me. Ok, that's my preference as well. > >> >> The question I have is which hosts (Architecture + OS combination) people >> care about that still need C++ conversion work and thus should be on >> that list? > > How about all linux and mingw hosts? assuming that xtensa can be > converted. x86-64 and x86 mingw built cleanly last I tried. I don't know about _all_ Linux hosts, hence the RFH. At least x86, x86_64, Aarch64, ARM, and PPC64 build cleanly. Or did, a few weeks back. >> >> This is where anyone can help! >> >> I've created the "users/palves/cxx-conversion" branch (on sourceware.org) >> where I committed a patch that implements the list idea. I filled in >> a set of hosts that I _thought_ wouldn't build, but I don't really know >> for sure. >> >> So I'd like to invite people to try to build master on their favorite >> host with --enable-build-with-cxx, and report back the result. > > We didn't hear anything on this yet, but we can't wait for it forever. Yeah. I got enthusiastic support offlist for C++ in general, but people don't seem to really be that interested or paying attention to random host architectures. Meanwhile, I tried a few BSD hosts on the compile farm and wrote a few patches: https://github.com/palves/gdb/commits/palves/cxx-conversion-netbsd but haven't had a moment yet to drive them to completion. I probably should sync up with Simon though, as I think I may be duplicating work he's done already. Thanks, Pedro Alves