Re: using automake to generate Makefile.in
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08 Jan 2016 14:53, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 08 Jan 2016 20:11, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:42:49 +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > is there a reason we don't use automake in the tree to manage > > > Makefile.in ? > > > > IIRC Tom Tromey (also a coauthor of automake) wanted to do that or at least he > > said it would be good to do that but just nobody has never done so. > > do we have a requirement that it be done treewide ? > or would people be fine with me doing (starting) in sim/ ? > doing it in just sim/ would allow for some limited testing > w/out breaking lots of people ... i probably should have looked harder ... some dirs are already using automake like ld/ gas/ bfd/ gold/ and more. i'll convert sim/ too. -mike
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWkCQbAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB5PoQANXFmFwXvqT0ncMTtwuvTatb DcYB5v8U/w2kboyzPkB/1CncTLYWkMmu+gMyy28qsmETHVYjk/U/O90bBkuOIVdP Y3jejJ+1khcAKOu1xzS9jN0PTqix6YYZ+63qAQTwYFN57HUpBTIhcIykPMLZ3wnY DqwKBNbd9KlBjZJ3/wnW5kgx92UKK8xYK8Fz5cfm97wYH2cyHYjOxtTv9eOabJF4 5bTeWtEffg6kumdikBrV1sSr0UXUNZA6Z+wObPDgp5Cbfoh2njweTx4goP+by9oH Ed2ZtqyOYASAPlkkvBlhXg9rTpZFYN+gmEBiPMZEj0diDiaLt7U8MMBlYApDEby+ 2wiZeCXi5TKG/SePZVHLk9MIlLjL1z20W5hBxOeJtH7D7VYFBZLTANC8EVePOAFM KAi6v5G24ErlXvR3OWb6fitJa2/jphdkLyOOe6mnK1SDPp0Js9rczKH7IiD914mi VXwMV8570XqXGBQh3+8lkhLoN6HJMnB4oIe8vS5EqoWS7nVMQAULyOTc4/7Z+yx/ E0TtxeNc5CMXRP3xYK+XouGHQC468IfqO0C7u1lunv7hmpy7RPtcyRBZy4EdWNI2 aOEmWxfyBiCFQMM1uHBqXgSD/j+lCXlWGCJkj9o8Aa44pOl01fglft5kvKC+3iz7 ULiyRp/z5fyEz6xEC9tU =095f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----