Re: Multi-threaded dwarf parsing
Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simon> Just to make sure I understand correctly: instead of blocking on Simon> the psymtabs creation at startup (in elf_symfile_read), you Simon> offload that to worker threads and carry on. If you happen to Simon> need the information and it's not ready yet, then the main code Simon> will have to block until the corresponding task is complete Simon> (dwarf2_require_psymtabs). That's correct. Simon> However, in each worker thread, each objfile is still processed Simon> sequentially. So if you are waiting for libxul.so's debug info Simon> to be ready (such as in #1), it won't be ready any faster. Is Simon> that right? Yes, each task constructs the psymtabs for an entire objfile. Simon> My view of the parallelism was that when reading an objfile's Simon> debug info, the main thread would offload chunks of work (a chunk Simon> == a CU) to the worker threads, but wait for all of them to be Simon> done before continuing. So it would still be blocking on the Simon> psymtab creation, but it would block for a shorter time (divided Simon> by the number of threads/cores, in an ideal world). It's just Simon> replacing a serial algorithm by a parallel one, but it would be Simon> mostly transparent to the rest of gdb. Yeah. This sounds doable in the abstract; though of course details matter. The DWARF reader has a lot of per-objfile state that would have to be split up (ideally) or locked. And there is stuff like buildsym.h, which is full of globals for no good reason. Simon> I hadn't thought of reading the info in the background, but I Simon> like the fact that it can get the user to a prompt faster. And I Simon> think these two forms of parallelism are not mutually exclusive, Simon> we could very well read CUs in parallel, in the background. I agree. Tom