RE: Is there a way to unset inferior-tty?
Marc Khouzam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 02:04:39PM +0000, Marc Khouzam wrote: > > > > I think this should just be fixed to work. > > > > > > > > The fix should be very similar to this: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=811a659a779fdf93293fe1105d99e9db171a8b68 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Pedro Alves > > > > > > Hi Marc, > > > > > > Here's a patch. If you like it I'll submit it to gdb-patches with > > > ChangeLog and all. > > > > Thanks! Might as well submit it. > > > > In the end I moved to a more complete solution for eclipse. Right > > after an inferior starts, eclipse will reset the tty to a new and > > valid value; that way, if the user does a 'run', the tty will already > > be properly set _and_ will direct inferior output to a valid eclipse > > console. > > I do the same thing in CGDB. Great, that helps confirm this is a good approach. Do you handle the output of a second inferior? If the user does 'add-inferior' and then runs it, I was planning on redirecting that new output to a new Eclipse console. This is causing me some trouble though because when the new inferior starts, I don't know if it was due to a 'run' or an 'attach', so I'm not sure if I should be expecting some output or not. Have you seen this too? Thanks