Re: can target code change architecture setting?
Doug Evans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADPb22TgJvjVNQeRH54K0Vs8RC5Qf=FvauB3MNbpndXBAomW8g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Duane Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Question #2 - How should the remote debugger respond to GDB? >>> >>> I don't think there is an "architecture change" packet. >>> >> >> Such packet is not needed, because GDB has to determine the gdbarch >> of each when unwinding. > > I think you are making the assumption that GDB always has access to full debug (i.e.: dwarf) information. > > In bare metal - You don’t always have this, you might have *labels* only (function name vrs address) but no source, no dwarf information. > > The only solution is to *ask* the target “what is your *current* arch. > > Or the target needs to send a “target-arch-change-indication” in some way. Agreed. Consider booting some x86 kernel on qemu (e.g., passing -s -S to qemu). At the start $pc is at the x86 reset location and the architecture is 16-bit. (gdb) tar ext :1234 Remote debugging using :1234 0x000000000000fff0 in ?? () At some later point the o/s will switch to 32 or 64-bit mode but until then gdb isn't as useful as one might want it to be.