Re: Default value for option "python print-stack"

Phil Muldoon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 18/02/17 15:00, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2017-02-14 19:03, Maxim Akhmedov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently the default value for an option "python print-stack" is "message"
>> that enables show only the messages of Python exceptions, but not their
>> tracebacks nor line numbers.
>>
>> Though, usually the message of a Python error itself is pretty useless as it
>> doesn't point you where exactly the error happened. Like, suppose you have a
>> pretty-printer written in Python, and then you get the following output:
>>
>> (gdb) yp lastKey
>> Python Exception <type 'exceptions.UnboundLocalError'> local variable
>> 'value_data' referenced before assignment:
>> Error occurred in Python command: local variable 'value_data' referenced before
>> assignment
>>
>> it doesn't really tell you anything, there may be lots of usages of a mentioned
>> variable, and due to the dynamic nature of Python you may easily mess somewhere
>> and it's particularly hard to find out the exact place by this message. Also,
>> the exception message is duplicated.
>>
>> I see two options here.
>> First one is choosing "full" as a default value for this option. Is their any
>> rationale for not doing that? Python tracebacks are usually not that large to
>> intentionally suppress them.
>> Second one is appending the sourcefile:lineno to the message. Like:
>> "/path/to/source.py:123". I believe it should be possible to extract this
>> information from the traceback object you get after invoking the Python code.
>>
>> From my point of view, it's a good idea to implement both of this options.
> 
> I agree with the first one, I spent so much time tracking bugs in my Python code before knowing about this setting.
> 
> Simon

Originally, the message only approach was chosen because Python
pretty-printed values that caused exceptions in backtraces would often
generate large amounts of Python exceptions that totally messed up the
backtrace. This is always the case when the pretty-printed values are
not initialised. I have no strong position on message or stack-trace;
I prefer the former because there was thought put into the reasoning.

Just as a note, you can set the exception printing parameter, as well
as any other GDB parameter, in the user .gdbinit.  I've often mulled,
and I think I brought up once, a review of GDB default values (like
set print pretty on, for example). This will generate some
disagreements to this list, though! ;)

Cheers

Phil
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.