Re: [PATCH] Lookup the JIT descriptor symbol first to avoid finding the PLT entry of the breakpoint in the wrong object file.
Yichao Yu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMvDr+Q3NWS9YK4Aefop_-eSPyM9A4btK5N+WkqnFsHJrJdZgQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Ping again. On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Yichao Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > Ping. Can anyone please review this? Or is there a better place to post this? > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Yichao Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Yichao Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Fix 20633 >> >> >> ..... I don't use git send-mail very often and missed the chance to >> type more comments.... >> >> The link to the bug report is >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20633 . I think >> ideally the interface should find all the global and local symbols and >> breakpoint on all of them since there isn't an agreement on who will >> provide it AFAICT (and for example,a process can load multiple copies >> of statically linked LLVM each providing a jit debugging interface). >> However, I'm not really sure what's the right function to use for that >> and it'll probably be a much bigger change so I went for this smaller >> change that fixes the original issue. >> >> Not sure how this should be tested....... =( >> >>> --- >>> gdb/jit.c | 17 ++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/gdb/jit.c b/gdb/jit.c >>> index 158d6d8..d6eb800 100644 >>> --- a/gdb/jit.c >>> +++ b/gdb/jit.c >>> @@ -1051,18 +1051,21 @@ jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, >>> if (ps_data->objfile == NULL) >>> { >>> /* Lookup the registration symbol. If it is missing, then we >>> - assume we are not attached to a JIT. */ >>> - reg_symbol = lookup_minimal_symbol_and_objfile (jit_break_name); >>> - if (reg_symbol.minsym == NULL >>> - || BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (reg_symbol) == 0) >>> - return 1; >>> + assume we are not attached to a JIT. >>> + Lookup the descriptor first since looking up the breakpoint might >>> + return a PLT entry in the wrong file. */ >>> >>> - desc_symbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (jit_descriptor_name, NULL, >>> - reg_symbol.objfile); >>> + desc_symbol = lookup_minimal_symbol_and_objfile (jit_descriptor_name); >>> if (desc_symbol.minsym == NULL >>> || BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (desc_symbol) == 0) >>> return 1; >>> >>> + reg_symbol = lookup_minimal_symbol (jit_break_name, NULL, >>> + desc_symbol.objfile); >>> + if (reg_symbol.minsym == NULL >>> + || BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (reg_symbol) == 0) >>> + return 1; >>> + >>> objf_data = get_jit_objfile_data (reg_symbol.objfile); >>> objf_data->register_code = reg_symbol.minsym; >>> objf_data->descriptor = desc_symbol.minsym; >>> -- >>> 2.10.2 >>>