Python, pretty printing, frame decorators and MI
Jan Vrany <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi there, to ease debugging, I have a set of python pretty printers and frame decorators - they work fine and print internal structures nicely. I also have a custom frontend using MI. I want to reuse these python printers / decorators in the frontend. This way I don't need to duplicate the code of pretty printer on top of MI. The problem is that if I enable pretty printing / frame filters in MI, I no longer get the "raw" values, only pretty printed. For example, let's say I have a pretty printer for type OBJ (pointer to a struct) which prints "0x12345678 (Symbol: #x:y:)" while without pretty printer it would just print "0x12345678". Similar happens for frame decorators. Once I enable frame filters/decorators, I no longer have access (on MI level) to raw function name as in DRARF debug info. How difficult would be to extend MI to provide both representations? The idea is to provide another "property" with "raw" represenstation. This way it'd be backward compatible as MI frontends are expected to ignore unknown properties. Could you give me some pointers/hints where to look GDB code in order to (try to) add this functionality? Would it be also possible to allow Python to define new MI commands in addition to CLI commands? Thanks. Best, Jan