Re: Information on usage
R0b0t1 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAD4mYiYujOYxiEJc91ii+-EJ0Cpgf81qC+EOwfYTQeTMvfWQg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Claudio Eterno <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > generally I work with a microcontroller that can be compiled in C by > its specific compiler(C166 family). With this compiler it is possible > to generate the preprocessed of a file but the output I obtain isn't > so exaustive like gcc does when I do the same job in linux (gcc -E > -dD...). Recently I made a test with gcc including paths of the > C166(so the default headers, instead the linux default libs, are taken > from the microcontroller directory). The result, apart the built-in > defines that gcc insert(these can be easily removed with a script), is > perfect for build a preprocessed header. > My question: is this usage of gcc a valid use? Should I expect some traps? > Consider this not a bug but an help request ... > Thank you, > This is the GDB mailing list. You may want to ask on the GCC user mailing list instead. I would expect what you want to do to work, but I am slightly confused as to why you want to do it. You may want to see if SDCC (the small device C compiler) fits your needs. It may support C166 devices, I can't tell for sure based on the search results I am seeing. Cheers, R0b0t1.