Re: Using separate debug info files with Windows DLLs
Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: Eli> Does the "debug link" method work with Windows DLLs produces by MinGW Eli> GCC and GNU Binutils? I think so. Eli> The "Separate Debug Files" node of the GDB manual talks only about Eli> executables, and doesn't mention shared libraries. If those methods Eli> are supposed to work with shared libraries in general, and Windows Eli> DLLs in particular, then I wonder (a) would the Windows loader live in Eli> peace with the additional .gnu_debuglink section that needs to be put Eli> there, and (b) when will GDB load the debug info using this method? I don't know the answer to (a), but for (b), as far as I know, coff_symfile_read is used for both executables and libraries; and at the end of coff_symfile_read it has code to read the debug link and find the separate debug file. This is done if the main objfile doesn't have any debug info: /* Try to add separate debug file if no symbols table found. */ if (!objfile_has_partial_symbols (objfile)) { [...] I wonder if the build-id approach could be extended to COFF somehow. build-ids are better because they don't require the slow CRC computation. Tom