Re: gdb -batch always exits with status 0
Gary Benson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 August 2018 at 19:29, Pedro Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > To me, it feels like you're not discussing the real issue. > > GDB _does_ stop processing scripts on first error. > > $ cat file1 > fail1 > fail2 > fail3 > $ cat file2 > fail4 > fail5 > fail6 > $ gdb -q -x file1 -x file2 > file1:1: Error in sourced command file: > Undefined command: "fail1". Try "help". > file2:1: Error in sourced command file: > Undefined command: "fail4". Try "help". > (gdb) > > Note, fail2, fail3, fail5 and fail6 were not run. > > What GDB does not do is consider an error from inside a script > sourced from the shell command line as reason to fail out. So for > example above, I think Gary is arguing that GDB should have behaved > like this: > > $ gdb -q -x file1 -x file2 > file1:1: Error in sourced command file: > Undefined command: "fail1". Try "help". > (gdb) > > I.e., "file2" was not sourced. > > In this aspect, "-ex" behaves exactly like "-x" -- you can think > of -ex as gdb internally pasting the -ex command in a script > and then sourcing it with -x. I don't know if I'm overthinking things, but basically I looked at the different places a command error can occur: /etc/gdbinit ~/.gdbinit -ix -iex -cd -d PROG -p CORE .gdbinit in cwd -x -ex For some of these it does seem to make sense to exit, e.g. if processing "-p PID" fails to end up attached to a process. But nobody is asking for change, nobody's having a problem with this, so I'm going to leave this here. Cheers, Gary