Re: win32-arm-low.c regptr 96 bits stored in 32 bit variable
Simon Marchi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2018-10-26 18:40, Bill Morgan wrote:
> Should this static variable ULONG zero be at least 96 bits?
>
> static char *
> regptr (CONTEXT* c, int r)
> {
> if (mappings[r] < 0)
> {
> static ULONG zero;
> /* Always force value to zero, in case the user tried to write
> to this register before. */
> zero = 0;
> return (char *) &zero;
> }
> else
> return (char *) c + mappings[r];
> }
>
> reg-arm.dat shows 96 bits for the ones that have mappings[r] == -1
>
> name:arm
> xmlarch:arm
> expedite:r11,sp,pc
> 32:r0
> 32:r1
> 32:r2
> 32:r3
> 32:r4
> 32:r5
> 32:r6
> 32:r7
> 32:r8
> 32:r9
> 32:r10
> 32:r11
> 32:r12
> 32:sp
> 32:lr
> 32:pc
> 96:f0
> 96:f1
> 96:f2
> 96:f3
> 96:f4
> 96:f5
> 96:f6
> 96:f7
> 32:fps
> 32:cpsr
Hi Bill,
By inspection, it does seem like a mistake, and that we would need to
return a pointer to a buffer at least as big as register r. But I have
no idea how to build/run/test gdbserver on win32/arm. If you are able
to confirm that there is a problem and test a fix, could you please
provide a patch?
To avoid this kind of problem again, we could return a pointer to a
dynamically-sized buffer adjusted to the size of the register.
Something like this:
static char *
regptr (CONTEXT* c, struct regcache *regcache, int r)
{
if (mappings[r] < 0)
{
static gdb::byte_vector zero;
/* Always force value to zero, in case the user tried to write
to this register before. */
zero.assign (regcache_register_size (regcache, r), 0);
return (char *) zero.data ();
}
else
return (char *) c + mappings[r];
}
Simon