Re: PSA: Formalizing the glibc<->gdb probe-based interface.
Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Carlos" == Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]> writes: Carlos> We document *other* probes in manual/probes.texi, but we should Carlos> add a section for stable guaranteed probes, and discuss a way Carlos> to deprecate the probes should we ever need to do that. Because probes are introspectable, it's actually better to remove them than to change their semantics -- the tools can adapt more easily to this. Of course it's good to have a transition period, or at least some sort of warning. As I recall we had some thoughts about ABI compatibility when adding the probes; namely that it is ok to add arguments to the end, but not ok to remove arguments or to change the meaning of existing arguments. HTH, Tom