Re: PSA: Formalizing the glibc<->gdb probe-based interface.

Tom Tromey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Carlos" == Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]> writes:

Carlos> We document *other* probes in manual/probes.texi, but we should
Carlos> add a section for stable guaranteed probes, and discuss a way
Carlos> to deprecate the probes should we ever need to do that.

Because probes are introspectable, it's actually better to remove them
than to change their semantics -- the tools can adapt more easily to
this.  Of course it's good to have a transition period, or at least some
sort of warning.

As I recall we had some thoughts about ABI compatibility when adding the
probes; namely that it is ok to add arguments to the end, but not ok to
remove arguments or to change the meaning of existing arguments.

HTH,
Tom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.