Re: Proposal: Drop GDB support for Python versions < 2.6

André Pönitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:39:15PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:28:48 +0100
> André Pönitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:11:45PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:44:39 +0000
> > > Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Actually, I'd even be fine with more radical move, dropping support 
> > > > for 2.x altogether. Python 2.7 support will end in less a year 
> > > > from now anyway.   
> > > 
> > > I'm not ready to drop support for all of 2.X.  
> > 
> > Out of curiosity: Why?
> > 
> > I.e. are there realistic scenarios where people actively use GDB's Python
> > interface (in this context here I am tempted to call it a fairly "recent"
> > addition to GDB, the first commit seems to be dated Aug 6, 2008), but are
> > not able to use it with Python 3.x (3.0 released on Dec 3, also 2008)?
> 
> I think so.  See Eli's reply in this thread.

I saw it after I wrote my mail. 
 
> When I build GDB on Fedora, I get a gdb enabled for python 2.7 unless
> I take measures (via --with-python=/usr/bin/python3) to use python 3.X
> instead.
> 
> I just checked three recent linux distro releases: Mint 19.1, Debian 9.8, and
> Fedora 29.  For each of them, running "python --version" shows that they're
> all Python 2.7.X.  Python 3 is often available, but you have to use the
> python3 command to use it.
> 
> Checking my CentOS 7.6 box, I find that Python 2.7.5 is installed, but
> Python 3 is not.  However, I see that I could install some version of
> Python 3 if I needed it.  (I'm not using this machine for development.)
> 
> I think we can drop Python 2.7 (and lower) sometime after the major
> Linux distributions start defaulting to python 3.X for the "python"
> command.

I am not sure that the name of the python command is a good indicator
for the timimg of the dropping support for Python 2.x:

First, the version of Python used for 'python' is technical, and in a few
cases also practically to the version of Python GDB uses. E.g. on some Ubuntu
machine here I see something like:

    ~ > gdb -batch -ex 'import sys' -ex 'py print(sys.version)'
    3.6.7 (default, Oct 22 2018, 11:32:17)

    ~ > python --version
    2.7.15rc1

    ~ > python3 --version
    3.6.7

Second, there might be reasons for a distribution to never change the name
of the python command, i.e. always keep it at e.g. 'python3', with no
'python' provided even after the distribution drops Python 2.x, so waiting
for a 'python --version' to produe 3.x might as well mean 'never'.

Andre'


    

    
> 
> Kevin
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.