Re: MI3 and async notifications
Joel Brobecker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gdb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I do agree, avoid the extra configurability - but I simply don't know how > to work with just async notifications to sync messages. It means that CDT > will have to issues the -break-insert, look for the done message and > "search" between them to find the =breakpoint-created that matched and > separately process any that don't. Please see my earlier message about how > to handle race condition between -break-inserts over MI and breaks inserted > from CLI. This race condition does not happen during normal operation > (where a human is driving everything) but does kick in during many > semi-automated flows. Perhaps this isn't a big problem, but to me it seems > the logic to match up -break-insert to =breakpoint-created in client side > is complex and bug prone. The part I don't understand is why it matters to sync the two. -- Joel