Re: MI3 and async notifications

Jonah Graham <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gdb.devel
Message-ID <CAPmGMvjHsivoDCs2Kx4SFxzVFt2s1HqM48hJz2F0bqsQHNrCWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 16:00, Pedro Alves <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/11/19 2:37 PM, Jonah Graham wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 04:50, Jan Vrany <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> As you can see, you get the notification *before* ^done response. Does
> >> that answer
> >> your questions?
> >>
> >>
> > Yes that does. I think CDT will use the mi-always-notify option.
>
> Funny.  ISTR that the breakpoint notification suppressing was
> originally done for CDT and reading/hearing Vladimir argue for
> it.  :-D  Though I can't find any arguing about that aspect
> around the original patch now:
>
>  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00471.html
>
> Vladimir said "As other MI notifications", but I checked out
> the tree for that commit (8d3788bd590a), and I couldn't find
> any other suppression that existed back then.
>

To be clear,  "CDT will use the mi-always-notify" meant that CDT would make
use of the option to turn the always notify *off*. In other words, I wanted
GDB to provide it as an option and not have it always on.

Jonah
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.