Re: Clang and call-clobbered location list entries

On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 13:44 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-10-17 09:25, David Stenberg wrote:
> > Should I perhaps write a Bugzilla ticket to help keep track of
> > this?
> 
> Yes, why not.  It's easier to find later than a discussion on the ML.

Sorry for the delay!

I wrote the following ticket for that: 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25143

> > Would it be fine to, at least as an initial step, introduce such
> > knowledge for some, but not all, of an architecture's ABIs? For
> > example
> > only add register knowledge for the AMD64 System V ABI, but not for
> > Windows?
> 
> Again, this is just my personal opinion, but I'd be fine with that.  
> Note that if it requires to change some expectations in some tests,
> it 
> means that we would need to expect different things for different 
> architectures, so it will complexify a little bit those tests.

Thanks, noted.

Best regards,
David